Source details
- Authors
- Michael Zaliznyak et al.
- Journal or source
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Year
- 2023
- DOI or authoritative URL
- 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac032
- Study type
- Cross-sectional self-report mapping study
- Population or material studied
- Adult men grouped by circumcision status reporting regional erogenous sensation and pleasure.
- Major findings
- Compared subjective anatomic maps and reports between circumcision-status groups.
- Limitations
- Self-report and cross-sectional design; not restoration. Erogenous ratings are not objective sensory thresholds or evidence of causal effects.
- Relevance to restoration
- Circumcision-status background evidence—not a restoration outcome study.
- Source-review status
- Abstract reviewed
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-11
Compared subjective anatomic maps and reports between circumcision-status groups.
Read the limitations
This record is an editorial summary. Follow the DOI or authoritative source, consider the study design and population, and do not generalize beyond what was studied.