Source details
- Authors
- Kimberley Payne; Lea Thaler; Tuuli Kukkonen; Serge Carrier; Yitzchak Binik
- Journal or source
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Year
- 2007
- DOI or authoritative URL
- 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00471.x
- Study type
- Laboratory comparison study
- Population or material studied
- Adult men grouped by circumcision status during laboratory sensory and arousal assessment.
- Major findings
- Compared selected sensation and sexual-arousal measures between groups.
- Limitations
- Small laboratory comparison; not restoration. Physiological arousal and subjective pleasure are distinct outcomes.
- Relevance to restoration
- Circumcision-status background evidence—not a restoration outcome study.
- Source-review status
- Abstract reviewed
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-11
Compared selected sensation and sexual-arousal measures between groups.
Read the limitations
This record is an editorial summary. Follow the DOI or authoritative source, consider the study design and population, and do not generalize beyond what was studied.