Source details
- Authors
- Clifford B. Bleustein; James D. Fogarty; Haftan Eckholdt; Joseph C. Arezzo; Arnold Melman
- Journal or source
- Urology
- Year
- 2005
- DOI or authoritative URL
- 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.007
- Study type
- Cross-sectional quantitative sensory testing
- Population or material studied
- Adult men grouped by circumcision status.
- Major findings
- Compared neurological sensory testing outcomes between circumcision-status groups.
- Limitations
- Cross-sectional group comparison; not a restoration study. Testing modalities and sampled sites should not be generalized to pleasure.
- Relevance to restoration
- Circumcision-status background evidence—not a restoration outcome study.
- Source-review status
- Abstract reviewed
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-11
Compared neurological sensory testing outcomes between circumcision-status groups.
Read the limitations
This record is an editorial summary. Follow the DOI or authoritative source, consider the study design and population, and do not generalize beyond what was studied.