RESEARCH LIBRARY RECORD

Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges, and experiences with medical and mental health professionals – An abridged summary of key findings

Useful direct evidence about reported experience, not objective proof of restoration outcomes.

ObservationalRestoration self-report

Source details

Authors
Tim Hammond; Lauren M. Sardi; William A. Jellison; Ryan McAllister; Ben Snyder; Mohamed A. B. Fahmy
Journal or source
International Journal of Impotence Research
Year
2023
DOI or authoritative URL
10.1038/s41443-023-00686-5
Study type
Targeted cross-sectional survey
Population or material studied
Self-selected adults recruited through restoration communities, commercial device audiences, forums, and genital-autonomy networks; 1,790 complete responses were reported.
Major findings
Documents restorers’ motivations, perceived experiences, reported successes, challenges, and interactions with professionals.
Limitations
Targeted recruitment; self-selection; self-reported outcomes; no non-restorer control; no physical or sensory examination. It cannot establish efficacy or causation.
Relevance to restoration
Useful direct evidence about reported experience, not objective proof of restoration outcomes.
Source-review status
Abstract reviewed
Last reviewed
2026-08-11
Correction or related DOI
10.1038/s41443-023-00741-1

Documents restorers’ motivations, perceived experiences, reported successes, challenges, and interactions with professionals.

Read the limitations

This record is an editorial summary. Follow the DOI or authoritative source, consider the study design and population, and do not generalize beyond what was studied.